top of page

Lawyer seeks to withdraw from sperm donor case

Topeka attorney Swinnen says his law firm has closed

Posted: June 1, 2015

 

By Tim Hrenchir

THE CAPITAL-JOURNAL

 

Benoit Swinnen has asked that he be allowed to withdraw as legal counsel for William Marotta, whom the state of Kansas contends is legally the father of a 5-year-old girl born after he donated sperm in a plastic cup to a Topeka same-sex couple.

 

Shawnee County District Court records indicate Swinnen on May 19 filed the motion, which indicated that Swinnen’s law firm has closed and attorney Charles Baylor would continue to be a counsel of record for Marotta.

 

Swinnen told The Capital-Journal Tuesday: “My withdrawal is simply a result of a career change and my growing family. I am the executive director of an agency that provides services to adults with intellectual disabilities.”

 

District Judge Mary Mattivi ordered in April that Marotta undergo genetic testing to determine if he is the girl’s biological father.

 

The Kansas Department for Families and Children since October 2012 has been pursuing the case, in which it is seeking to have Marotta declared the father so he can be forced to pay child support regarding the girl Jennifer Schreiner bore in 2009.

 

Marotta said he didn’t intend to be the child’s father and signed a contract waiving his parental rights and responsibilities while agreeing to donate sperm to Schreiner and Angela Bauer. Marotta contacted the women after they placed an ad seeking a sperm donor on Craigslist.

 

Mattivi ruled in January 2014 the contract was moot because Schreiner and Bauer didn’t follow a Kansas statute enacted in 1994, which Mattivi said requires a licensed physician to perform the artificial insemination in cases involving sperm donors.

The crowd weighs in.
A few reader comments

"Gay and Lesbian couples have children and the children benefit from two parents that love each other and the child. It matters not what they have between their legs. Scientific facts back that up not your belief system."

 

"As a person that has sold sperm, I am very concerned about this case. If the child support is granted, I could end up having the state or individuals coming after me and I did not even get to have sex with any of the women."

 

"No good deed goes unpunished in Kansas...He did a good deed and now is facing heavy legal fees, even if he wins ....and 18 years of child support if he loses.  The state of Kansas should be ashamed, for coercing the mother, AND for filing a frivolous suit against the donor in an effort to escape supporting the child."

 

 

 

 

 

"If any couple has a child from a sperm donor, the sperm donor should be out of the picture. The couple is responsible for that child!"

 

"Once again the State rears it's ugly head and dictates to We the People."

 

"Why is this any different than if it was a man-woman relationship and one parent worked, the other stayed home.. .and then they split and the primary breadwinner in the relationship can no longer work? It is THEIR child, not his."

 

 

 

 

Feedback

 

If you have corrections or anything else, send it to:

 

jjsite2015@hotmail.com

​​​

© Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page