top of page

Read most of the news stories on the case from The Topeka Capitol Journal.

Watch news interviews.

These related stories may affect the case.  

The state of Kansas is trampling on the rights of the childless and the rights of the gay community as it pursues this suit against our friend, William Marotta.  It has been long, drawn out and costly.  But Will continues to have the will to stand against the state.  His friends started a fundraising campaign to support him, so he can continue his fight. 

This site's purpose is to provide more information about the case than is found on the fundraising or FaceBook site.  We hope you will also visit these sites.

 

Thank you,

 

The friends and supporters of Will.  

Kansas Tramples Rights!

  • s-facebook

11/30/16.  After waiting 11 months for the judges final decision, he got word that he was judged the sperm donor, not the father!  

But William still has paid many thousands of dollars since this started in 2012, that the state forced him to put out for his defense against this unfair lawsuit. Therefore, we are still actively fundraising. If you would share the gofundme page, it would be greatly appreciated!

2/15/18. It's been over a year since the decision, and the GoFundMe page has been closed.  This site & FB page will remain open. 

The crowd weighs in.
A few reader comments

"Gay and Lesbian couples have children and the children benefit from two parents that love each other and the child. It matters not what they have between their legs. Scientific facts back that up not your belief system."

 

"As a person that has sold sperm, I am very concerned about this case. If the child support is granted, I could end up having the state or individuals coming after me and I did not even get to have sex with any of the women."

 

"No good deed goes unpunished in Kansas...He did a good deed and now is facing heavy legal fees, even if he wins ....and 18 years of child support if he loses.  The state of Kansas should be ashamed, for coercing the mother, AND for filing a frivolous suit against the donor in an effort to escape supporting the child."

 

 

 

 

 

"If any couple has a child from a sperm donor, the sperm donor should be out of the picture. The couple is responsible for that child!"

 

"Once again the State rears it's ugly head and dictates to We the People."

 

"Why is this any different than if it was a man-woman relationship and one parent worked, the other stayed home.. .and then they split and the primary breadwinner in the relationship can no longer work? It is THEIR child, not his."

 

 

 

 

Feedback

 

If you have corrections or anything else, send it to:

 

jjsite2015@hotmail.com

​​​

© Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page